Saturday, January 12, 2013

OSCAR WATCH: Les Miserables


Hmm, that was...nice. As I think back on this adaptation of "Les Miserables", that's the easiest way to some up my feelings. Unfortunately, simply being "nice" doesn't quite cut it. "Les Miserables" is a tragic story about many things - love, redemption, revolution and loss. It's aptly named because the source novel is full of misery indeed. I tried to read it, but I couldn't get make it through on account of how despondent it is. I'm a big fan of the stage musical version though, so this film was definitely on my must-see list. Taking all of this into consideration, why isn't this film more affecting? It's got all the goods, but the transition from to stage to screen wasn't entirely successful. The film is a mixed bag, varying in quality from song to song. There are various reasons for the uneven nature of this film.
The first thing I noticed was the cinematography. Of course, it's hard not to notice it when it's the main source of criticism, but so be it. For me though, the problem wasn't the closeups but the quick cuts that really took some time to get used to. Within each song, the image never lingers as it quickly switches angles and perspectives. It's such a disservice to the production design, which is a shame as it's actually one of the film's strong points. Between scenes as well, there is a mad rush to get to the next setting due to the sung-through nature of the musical. This made me question whether this material is really suited for the big screen. I don't remember having trouble with this when I watched "Evita" though, so the sung-through style wasn't the problem. I guess the naysayers were right then...the cinematography is bad.
In terms of the casting, the actors are all quite capable of delivering the splendid songs. If I had to pick a weak link, it would have to be Russell Crowe and Amanda Seyfried. They have good voices and I was quite taken with particular songs of theirs, but you could sense the strain in their voices in some instances. Crowe mostly stayed within his limited range, so we don't really get that furious rage we expect from Javert.
Apart from these 2, the other cast members were superb. Eddie Redmayne killed it with his version of "Empty Chairs in Empty Tables", Samantha Barks was devastating as the scorned Eponine, while Helena Bonham Carter and Sacha Baron Cohen provided some nice comic relief (although I expected Cohen to play to his comedic strengths more). In the lead role, Hugh Jackman was quite the revelation giving perhaps his best acting performance while simultaneously showing off his impressive pipes. He certainly deserves his Oscar nomination. The presence that looms over the entire film is Anne Hathaway though. She is every bit as good as you've heard. Her interpretation of Fantine digs way down into the depths of despair. It surpasses anything you'll see from the stage interpretation, which is limited by the need to sound perfect and polished. I knew she had a good voice, but I didn't know it was THAT good! She goes through a wide range of emotions while still staying firmly in key. When she sings "I Dreamed A Dream", it's one of the few instances where the closeup cinematography works perfectly. She just slayed me. Just give her the damn Oscar already!
Yet despite all the fantastic voices on hand, there are some key songs that just fell flat. Namely, "One Day More" and "Bring Him Home" didn't stir me up like they usually do. Especially in the latter, Jackman's voice didn't seem quite right. Just listen to Alfie Boe's version and you'll realize how soft and divine it's supposed to sound. Since these crucial songs didn't quite grab me, I wasn't immersed in the story like I wanted. Without this passion to guide you through, the film ended up feeling like a string of individual music videos.
Overall, the kudos should really go to Claude-Michel Schönberg and Herbert Kretzmer, since they wrote the music and lyrics. These songs are so lovely that you can just give me some good singers and I'll be fine. Despite my reservations, I still feel that it's a nice film as it gives the fans a cool cinematic visualization of the musical. It's a pity Hooper didn't let us see more of the well-designed sets behind all those closeups.
In terms of Oscar, the film certainly has Best Supporting Actress in the bag. It should also stand a good chance in Best Sound Mixing (I loved the background orchestra) and Best Makeup & Hairstyling (superb "ugly" work). Apart from that, Best Actor and Best Production Design are contenders, but they face stiff competition. The other categories are longshots which probably won't happen (Best Picture, Best Costume Design and Best Original Song). This Oscar season is ripe for upsets though, so anything can happen.

7 comments:

  1. I have to ask, not a criticism of your review, but why when writing on musical critics tend to often go to the "it's like a string of music videos" route? Considering that this one is almost completely sung-through and makes so much use of recitative it's more like one continuous video than a "series of" music videos. By that token, wouldn't any musical be a series of individual music videos if you watched the songs and cut what comes in between?

    (Or is it not a criticism and just an observation?)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, I've never felt that way with a musical before...so it's not a description I apply automatically.
      It's not really a condemnation, the "music video" thing is just how it felt to me. As I said in the review, the music wins me over regardless of the filming techniques.

      For a film version, I wanted the scene transitions to be better, to really convey the overarching narrative.



      You're the theatre expert though, so obviously you would approach something like this differently.

      Delete
  2. Great review. Loved this movie and the music as well. Everything just took me by storm and it's such a shame that it's not going to be getting any serious Oscar-attention, except for maybe Anne. But that's not so bad, because she actually does deserve it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks. It definitely deserves other Oscar attention aside from Supporting Actress. The Makeup, Production Design, Hugh Jackman and Costume Design are all spectacular.

      Delete
  3. I was blown away by Hathaway's performance and enjoyed the film on the whole. I agree with you about the cinematography though.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I watched it last night and I've to admit that this was the best movie-watching experience this year. I thought that all-singing musical could be boring but no, not even for a second.

    Hathaway is brilliant. She deserves Oscar even for singing `I Dream a Dream` only. Jackman could be a strong alternative of Lewis.

    I think live recording worked perfectly and close shots of faces did well too, cause it made the musical more emotional.

    All in all, Anne wins, definitely; Sound Mixing is almost shoo-in; I would give credit for Production Design over Anna Karenina. And `Suddenly` sound pretty lovely.

    ReplyDelete